Bangle.js 2 vs Garmin Venu 4: which lets you own your data?

Bangle.js 2 scores higher for data ownership (85 vs 68). They differ on official api, gadgetbridge / open firmware, home assistant.

Bangle.js 2Garmin Venu 4
Score85/100 (Great)68/100 (Good)
Official API ⚡Open API (25/25)Partner/business only (10/25)
Data exportLocal raw files (25/25)Local raw files (25/25)
Gadgetbridge / open firmware ⚡Supported (20/20)Partial (10/20)
Home Assistant ⚡None (0/15)Community (HACS) (8/15)
SubscriptionNot needed (15/15)Not needed (15/15)
SubscriptionNoneConnect+ optional

⚡ = where they differ.

Bangle.js 2

Open-source, hackable JavaScript smartwatch. Full Gadgetbridge support and no account at all. The gold standard for data ownership, traded off against polish and sensors.

API · Export · Home Assistant

Garmin Venu 4

Garmin's AMOLED lifestyle watch. Same data story as other Garmins: activities and health data sync as FIT files you can copy off the watch, Garmin Connect lets you export, the Connect Developer Program is for approved business partners, and Home Assistant support is community-made. Gadgetbridge lists the Venu 4 among supported Garmin devices; we rate it partial until feature coverage is confirmed. Garmin Connect+ is optional; core features don't need it.

API · Export · Home Assistant

Related comparisons

Bangle.js 2 vs Garmin Forerunner 165

Bangle.js 2 vs Garmin vívoactive 5

Amazfit Bip 6 vs Bangle.js 2

Bangle.js 2 vs Garmin fēnix 8

Amazfit Bip 6 vs Garmin Venu 4

Apple Watch (SE / Series / Ultra) vs Bangle.js 2

Open in the interactive compare tool

Scores come from each device's cited sources, last verified 2026-10-20. See how we score.

📬 The Data Ownership Digest

Occasional email: API changes, export deadlines, and new scorecards.

Placeholder: signup isn't connected yet. No email is stored.